Tuesday, October 24, 2006
Tuesday, October 3, 2006
How Long Will Cigars In The Box, Sealed
The Feast of the Mid-Autumn arrives in China on the 15th of the 8th lunar month (around October). Aadmirer the full moon and eat moon cakes are the main traditions of this feast. Lotus seed paste
mooncake: Cakes of the moon to the lotus paste and green tea Matcha
Friday, September 8, 2006
Pic Of Prolapsed Uterus
by Maud Thomas Yeuse
In the West, the organization of Social equality is characterized by the existence of two social equality, supposedly dictated by a kind of equivalence between essentialist biology, identity and the organization of society.
The binary consists of collection of its kind (personal and social) by sex. This mode is a system of historical mediations, sociocultural and political, not a state of nature.
Gender identity given at birth (boy or girl) and entered in the intergenerational transmission makes gender identity gender biosociologique (equivalent male-male-and female-female masculinity-femininity).
Anchoring based not on biology but on the transmission of identity. It is the subordination of this transmission recorded as single event to an anchorage naturalizing.
Gender (masculinity / femininity) based on the subordination of living standards and status within society according to a binary gerrymandering of both sexes in the social equivalent experience / standards-status. This kind of naturalistic fiction coinciding sex was strongly criticized, but does not seem out of the rut of essentialism. Essentialism which is derived directly from the binary model dominated by the patriarchal, heterosexual male. After the female gender, and on this basis, the West has created a transsexual as a mode of transition in order to save a binary model challenged everywhere. The department of psychiatry will be appointed to do this in order to regulate this is considered new, specific to the West.
Model doubling of both sexes is a fiction almost religious belief in a causal and linear identity that is constructed from / to the biological birth. The transmission of gender identity at birth (a boy, it's a girl) is erased in this mode naturalist.
The political model of the binary, far from being a founding model is a fiction designed to naturalizing mix all components of society While a human undivided indivisible, linear and causal. The man and the woman follows from the prodigious historical constructionism has continued to mutate throughout the centuries.
This model is also strengthened in the close political and ideological naturalness heterosexual field organization of society, including institutions. In the first place, family and heterosexual marriage. Heterosexuality in this new drama is composed of a standard office and institutional component called traditional society. The establishment of model "family" has undergone significant change in the "extended family" for the "nuclear family" and today all the reconfigurations of the stepfamily, single parent, gay or lesbian parents, family of 3 adults (or more), family with internationally adopted children, etc..
In these mutations, it appears that inequality and social asymmetry between the sexes (male and female) will be deported with modernity on the emergence of homosexuality and for a tiny fraction of the bisexuality.
To read the full article:
http://natamauve.free.fr/socialite_ternaire.html
Friday, September 1, 2006
Where Can I Find Bontrail?
Declaration OII - USA in favor of full respect for human rights intersex people
Due to the arbitrary division of human beings into two legal categories, male or female, intersex people are deprived of one of the most fundamental human rights, he can live and be recognized as they are, ie as an intersexed person. Sex beings living is not binary and the two sexes, male and female, are not a valid description of biological reality. Accordingly, we will never have valid definition of what it means to be a man or a woman because, in this context, there is no way to establish a definition that prevents people intersex being mutilated, normalized force and inserted into one or other of these categories. Thus, we demand that
1) No person intersexed does track imposed arbitrary insertion in one of these categories, because it deprives us of our most fundamental right by endorsing the normalization of force and intolerance against our natural sex - intersex.
2) That, on the one hand, the government stopped the forced and arbitrary assignments to a binary gender system and it allows everyone to integrate gender in which they feel they belong. If not, we ask that intersex people are guaranteed the same legal status and the same rights as those enjoyed by other persons whose body is that of a man or a woman standard. We therefore ask what we can do legally recognized as intersex, with the right for people who have this status to marry which they wish to have full protection against all forms of sexual harassment (which men and women have already) and can live openly and proudly taking our identity by having a medical and legal recognition of our sex. As some intersex people identify as men or as women, the latter should in no way be forced to change their legal status, which would also violate their most fundamental rights.
3) We believe that this would be a plus for the whole society to recognize the existence of intersex people and not only for intersexed people themselves. In doing so, many stereotypes and other standards totally artificial gender are thus challenged.
4) We say openly that we are proud to be es-ourselves and we demand an end to silence, shame and standardization enforced and institutionalized against us has yet become law in this country.
Monday, August 28, 2006
Hairdos For Army Balls
by Rara Starblanket
Spokesman OII for Two-Spirits
http://www.intersexualite.org/TwoSpirit.html
Translated by Marlene Riwkeh MEGeS
Revised by Curtis E. Hinkle
(Translator's note: I did not use words such as hybrids - "a Friend", "gifted-e" in the text. The French can not express a concept of three sexes. Even if we consider that the neutral is in French, it does not solve the problem because the Two Spirits were not "neutral" but a full-fledged sex in many of these cultures. So I decided to use and masculine and feminine, but never a mixture of the two because it gives a false sense of Two Spirits were not a mixture of two things or hybrids, but rather a category of people that fully integrates the essence of the Great Spirit, while still incorporating a gender other party.)
For Oll, I am the person who speaks for the people of third sex, those of Indian origin. I have many writings and artefacts which were presented to me as the original French-Chippewa. This has been hidden because my father wanted to forget this medium because it was very discriminated as mestizos, a mixed blood as they say.
My discovery of this heritage has coincided with my intersexuality, things that are concealed from me, yes of course, but we need to understand the generation that has kept these secrets. These were people who experienced major conflicts and the difficult times of economic crisis. They were and are a great community, so their little secrets and rigid morality should not overshadow the good that this generation has done.
Full story:
http://www.intersexualite.org/TwoSpirit.html # anchor_29
Friday, July 21, 2006
Does A Hernia Come From Your Balls
Ice Rose
Glace Ginger
Sesame Ice
Matcha green tea ice
Glace Pink Grapefruit Lychee and
Recipe Ice Pink Grapefruit Lychee
4 eggs beaten
60
sugar 260ml single cream whole
50ml pink grapefruit syrup 140g sugar lychee
few drops of red food coloring (optional)
- Put sugar, syrup, glucose and cream in a casrole and melt over low heat.
- Bring the mixture to a boil and added four beaten eggs, whisking,
Remove from heat and let cool.
- Pour this equipment in a box, cover and place in freezer overnight.
- Before serving, place in refrigerator 15 minutes to soften.
Sunday, July 16, 2006
Red Spots On The Labia
Intersex - Sex that dare not speak its name
By Curtis E. Hinkle
You can not really say whether a scoop to say that we live in a sexist society. However, just when we think we're making progress in our fight for equality and dignity, we are caught by surprise by the backlash and political force that supports it. We have recently found evidence of this powerful machinery hetero-sexist United States, with the announcement from ISNA, Intersex Society of people in North America, about his adoption of "disorder of sex development" ("Disorder of Sexual Development as DSD" in English). This American organization says that this term would be better for children than the word "intersex" or "intersex" in English.
I recently read an article by Vincent Guillot, an activist from the intersexed community in Europe which is entitled "It's up to us to get out of medical discourse." I applaud this title. It also intersexed adults to speak out against the hetero-sexism disease and its devastating consequences for intersex children. We were children. Doctors and "experts" who speak on our behalf are not always heart to defend our own interests. They are part of a gender machinery which has made tremendous damage to many of us during our childhood, they do not listen to us and they continue to try to control our lives.
The fact that some intersex adults can actually believe that they suffer from a medical condition should not in any way to silence those of us who reject this view of pathological intersex. It was quite possible to use the term "intersex" or "intersex" as an adjective describing a medical condition of formation atypical of a person's sex. The person seeking medical help could get it, with all diagnoses and pathologies associated with the physicians did not typically be male or female. Nobody dictates the way of seeking help for intersex people who felt their bodies as pathological, and nobody would argue they are not entitled to receive as well. But the situation has radically changed with the creation of the acronym "DSD" for "disorder of sex development." The latter tends to stigmatize a large segment of the intersex community because of its purely pathological, sexist and demeaning to consider intersex people. We have a duty to protect the children of a policy as destructive, sexist, stigmatizing which is vigorously defended by our medical institutions, legal and social issues.
close look at this term. It may help us understand the mentality of those who chose to adopt it to talk about defenseless children. First they say that the child has a disorder. Merck is the editor of one of the most widely used medical reference in the United States. Here is the definition of a disability after their website: "a disorder or abnormal operation, a physical or mental disease" [1]. Since the day of birth, and more even before his birth, an intersexed child is labeled as abnormal or disturbed because they would have received a malfunction or a physical disease. This unbalanced or abnormal operation is based on centuries of reduction of their reproductive function. Set a child on the sole basis for its future reproductive and sexual functioning is clearly sexist and certainly something that the children in question would not understand because they have no experience of what it means to be an adult sexually mature. This sexualized children from their birth and sends the message that their true goal in life is to have a body capable of functioning in a heterosexual relationship whose main purpose is reproduction, even though it is unlikely that any treatment they will ever happen again. The treatments imposed on them is intended to enable them to simulate heterosexual activity later in life, even though it is possible that this does not affect them, depending on how they grow and how they integrate their sexuality (or lack of interest in sex). It is not acceptable to assume that all children will feel the desire to have heterosexual relationships as adults. This often makes them even more confused and ashamed because they are treated to a fault (ie failure to be born with the need for a reproductive function, and thus heterosexual).
Their body becomes a destabilizing element for sexist institutions and young child is locked in a series of speeches about who he / she is the appearance that his body should have in order to have any hope of register in the system. But my questions are: Is all this really helps the child? Is this child really is unbalanced or abnormal? Does all this really requires intervention Medical ? What is really wrong about the body of intersex children? Why is it necessary to "correct" the child? I think the answer to all these questions lies in the profoundly sexist and heterosexist ideology that controls our society and has nothing to do with the real interests of children. She cares only for the protection of traditional institutions of our society. The real disorder or disturbance is not in the body of intersex children, it is the ideology of the society in which the child will live and who have legitimate use a wide range of biomedical technologies to impose an order that did nothing natural, which was established as an obvious and, therefore, legitimate all necessary measures to require all persons who fail to comply not the traditional division of gender and all human beings between men and women.
Blurring the arbitrary division between two categories of people is a threat to a heterosexist structure that can not live by imposing a dichotomy between men and women who become two social categories, almost two classes separately. Power inequalities between members of these categories are not considered a danger. No, they are helpless children who become the battlefield and must pay a very high price simply because they are born with a body that involves arbitrary categories and gender who have no legitimacy to be required for this system hetero-sexist work. The second term of the term "DSD" with which some are trying to replace the word "intersex" is "sex". It is used to denote the sex that dare not speak its own name. The following definition is a fairly good description of what most people mean when they use this word:
"A biological construction, based on biological characteristics that make possible the reproduction" (from Krieger N. A Glossary for Social Epidemiology, J Epidemiol Community Health 2001; 55:693-700.)
The hetero-normative character This definition is obvious. She said that according to a biological perspective, humans are essentially dimorphic. But even from a strictly biological perspective, gender can not be defined as. Furthermore, biology is just one of the disciplines which deals with the human body and gender. From a genetic standpoint, sex in human beings is much more complex. Genetic variation between people who they are not men or women "standard" are so many in fact few people are really the criteria, even physically. The mere fact of using the terms "male" and "female" when referring to genetic markers poses serious problems because what is known as a marker "male" does not necessarily lead to sex, etc.. formulaic character of an ideology and artificial and arbitrary binarism becomes even more evident when one looks at the genetic components of sex. The message that many intersex children hear is that sex is in itself a disorder, disability and physical disease. This does absolutely nothing to alleviate the stigma associated with being intersex. In fact, it only increase it, once again making sure that intersexuality is sex that dare not speak its name. Like being a hermaphrodite-e was so humiliating, we are told now that the term "intersex" is too "political" to be used when speaking of a child (see the article by ISNA describing why this organization believes that it is so [2]). But actually what is wrong with the fact not be clearly male or female? We are really impossible to love a child who does not meet these criteria artificial? Having red hair is not common, but that is perfectly natural to be born and, as is perfectly natural that children are born intersexed, and it does not usually require more medical treatment than to be born with red hair. Ie none. And all children, whether born with red hair or intersex need the same love and unconditional acceptance of same by their parents. Deny your identity and refuse to admit that you are intersex is not really loving welcome and unconditional. And this has serious consequences for the child. Legally, we have two sexes "official". This system of law is necessary to maintain a patriarchal structure and hetero-sexist. But there is nothing natural. It is imposed politically and socially and intersex children pay a terrible price to reveal what is obvious, however, that this distinction between two almost contradictory gender is arbitrary. These children have the misfortune of being born with a sex that dare not speak its name, they are intersexed. The last term "diagnosis" imposed on young children is "development". This term is used even though the term "differentiation" is more appropriate given that what doctors consider it a disorder is that the fetus has not differentiated "correctly" in a boy or a girl. The word "differentiation" is more appropriate if the goal is to impose "differences" between men and women stringent. Using the word "development" does obscure things - as if the supporters of "DSD" trying to say that the problem is just that reproductive tissues have not developed properly so that the problem is that by its mere existence, the child defies strict and arbitrary divisions between people that we rank among men and those that we rank among the women. This can be seen clearly if we examine the manner in which a child born with a big penis is processed. It is very unlikely to be perceived as having a disorder of sexual development, even though his sexual organs would be "overdeveloped" compared to other children. In fact, having a big penis does not endanger the distinctions between legal and sexist men and women. Such a child would suffer no treatment. The problem in the eyes of the entourage of intersex children is they are not clearly differentiated as boys or as girls, and it has nothing to do with development, underdevelopment or overdevelopment. I read an interesting comment by an activist who dealt particularly compelling connotations of the word "development" and its reasoning was particularly meaningful. The use of this term tends to believe that the child is not fully developed. Such a statement is not particularly liberating when applied to children.
It tends more to believe that those of us who have not developed into boys are just full of children and people who have only partially developed. This prevents any person who identifies as a man but that does not correspond at all points in the standards of that class to join, even though many of us have an identity and a man's life. (and this is where we find most clearly an ideology of tens of centuries old in the minds of people so called at the forefront of scientific research).
I think the people in the intersex community who disagree with the politicization of gender intersex (and their own bodies) have the right to denounce it. Others also have the right to speak on behalf of children, but this right may be forfeited by a few. Intersex children to believe they are dysfunctional, distorted, or the wrong sex and only partially developed does not help at all. We must dare to speak on their behalf, we must dare to talk about sex that dare not speak its name, that of intersex children.
[1] The definition of Merck can be found at: http://tinyurl.com/7flku
[2] "Parents and doctors are not going to want to Give a Child With A Label Meaning politicized. " article ISNA's explaining why they use the term DSD (Disorder of Sex Developtment) can be found at: http://www.isna.org/node/1066
Tuesday, July 4, 2006
My Nose Look Weird In Some Lights
International Organization intersex
www.intersexualite.org
Note by the Chairman
I refuse to take a public position for or against any member or group associated with OII. As president, I think it is my responsibility to let people say what they feel important to them, not to publicly express my agreement or my disagreement with them. My own Positions are located in all the articles I have written. Others are free to disagree and be heard. There are too many ways of being intersex for one person to speak for the whole community of intersex people. I myself can not speak for the whole community but only for a certain segment. Other intersex people have a different experience and different perspectives than mine. They have the right to be heard, even if some of their views do not match those of some individuals or groups.
I often receive inquiries about certain items or about some opinions on the site of the OII. Often the person who writes believes that intersex is a gender identity, which is the case for some people. But OII is not only an organization of people who identify as intersex, but for all those who are physically intersexed whatever their identity and all those with intersex identity. It also includes persons who are allied often disagree among themselves. OII welcomes allies of all communities, but the fact that these communities may disagree with each other is a Questions which we feel we do not have to incur. We're just very pleased that many communities feel they share the same goals as us, in regard to human rights and the fight against sexism.
It is difficult to respond other than my own point of view questions about transsexuality, homosexuality, heterosexuality, the "problems" of gender identity (or the so-called disorders gender identity) and to disagreements regarding the opinions expressed on this subject. And my opinion on these topics will not necessarily shared by others. Members are free to hold diverse views and opinions also are not "politically correct" for some people.
There is a wide diversity of opinions among members. Nobody speaks for all of OII. All members do.
The expression of opinion of a person or group does not mean that all members of the JIC's shares or does not support certain groups or communities. The fact that there are disagreements between the LGBT community and within the same community or between feminists is not essential for OII. For the latter, get involved in resolving issues of transgender people, lesbians, feminism, the gay, would deviate from its basic purpose - the visibility of intersex people and human rights regardless of their identity. Intersex people have a myriad of opinions on these subjects. OII considers it his duty to let them express their own opinion. We are just beginning to have a voice. Censor a small group already terribly marginalized because some of its members express opinions that are not politically correct for some other identities or groups or other political movements is not the purpose of the OII. Our goal is to help intersex people have a voice but not many votes.
Thanks for your support and listen to us
In solidarity,
Curtis E. Hinkle
President of the International Organization of OII
intersex
www.intersexualite.org
Sunday, April 9, 2006
How To Configure My Desmume Emulator
I'm looking for the first time
You look down, the little guy shy
And you smile gently and I hold your hand in mine
- two hands hermaphrodites
I hold you in my arms and hold you against me
You the guy with the small porcelain skin
Soft as velvet - It gives me chills And I
the big girl with beard
I feel you in my arms finally crumble Our
two bodies sing in unison
I put my lips on yours - Two
body electric - two sparkling souls
A long kiss waited so long
between two hermaphrodites who find themselves at last And I
you blow gently in the ear
I love boys who are girls ...
Who
like girls who are boys
Curtis E. Hinkle
Monday, March 27, 2006
2 Black Wires One Red Wire
The use of discursive techniques as a means of objectification of marginalized groups
faceless people
by Curtis E. Hinkle
The purpose of this essay is to analyze the texts on the website of ISNA, the most visible organization in the field of intersex, in order to understand the different discursive techniques that the organization uses consciously or unconsciously that reduce very subjects of their discourse to silence.
Here is a summary of different techniques that I will address in this analysis:
1. There is no noun (name) used to (on) intersex (e).
2. Preponderance of blogs by people who are not intersex.
3. Almost exclusive concentration on the body
4. Total refusal to consider gender as an important issue for intersex (e) s.
5. Infantilization continual
6. Proliferation of medical discourse
After reading the articles on their site, I noticed that the total absence of a noun or name for people who are the object of their discourse is the most flagrant offense resulting from their way of controlling language to objectify and marginalize intersex (e) s. How is this possible? If you are talking about have no names, to name a noun, it gives the impression that the objects you are talking about have no substance, they are of no consequence. Otherwise, we create a name, a noun to categorize the subject of discussion. Instead of using a name like intersex (e), or the old term hermaphrodite, which is not biologically correct, but has great historical significance as name or category for us, we are constantly referred to as children or people with intersex, which requires us to disappear again in one of two categories of male / female that our bodies challenged first.
The refusal to use a name or create one that many intersex (s) agree dehumanizes the real subjects of their speeches because we must be willing to be seen through the prism of binary male or female before become the subject of discussion. It is an erasure and we disappear into a vacuum to become people without faces, the object that never dares to name.
However, if you analyze the text of the site you arrive at this conclusion, that is to say, there is no name for us on this site. That way, people who want to talk to us as objects have all the power discourse and the technique of objectification which supports all other result.
One other discursive techniques that represent the intersex (e) as an object without being able to do is to defer to others, especially women who do intersex is not talking to us. If you look at the site, almost all blogs on the site are controlled by women who speak for us but who are not intersex. In this way, the subject of their discourse is still a subject which we speak and never direct voice as narrator actual speech.
Thus, we can fix the attention of the reader to the body without ever talking to the person in the body in question. When it comes to us is almost always in our body, another form of objectification and to immobilize the object, it precludes any discussion of gender by stating it's a question that is not important to us. However, almost always (te) s and intersex (s) with whom I have spoken have told me that gender issues are very important for her / them. But if you start talking like that, we begin to humanize the subject and we must address the taboo subject of this site, the identity of people are talking about. If it gives identity to the subject, we risk losing control of speech and others could more easily ask you to explain why these are people who are not intersexed who speak for us all the time and why they exert so much control with words, definitions of topics without leaving their site about the subjects themselves of their identities, their experiences in a society that has no place for them.
Another technique is the discursive continuing infantilisation of intersex (e). By that I mean that most of all discussions on the site talks about us as children. This is important. But by focusing attention on a small child still, it gives the impression that we need others to speak as a child is not able to speak. If intersex (s) talked about their own lives as adults, we should make every issue of definitions, terms and all the talk about this site because it would be more obvious that the subjects in question here on their site are almost entirely absent.
And finally, the proliferation of medical discourse that fixes attention on the pathology of subjects undermines all the efforts of our emancipation from the institution which aims to erase us. The purpose of the medicalization of intersex (s) is to make us disappear. The normalization of our bodies and our gender are used to protect the status quo because our lives would destabilize the entire binary system.
These discursive techniques dehumanizes us and we returned (s) people without faces we have found in medical texts when we were young and we wept to see our own bodies exhibited as freaks. Voiceless, faceless, without a place. We hid (e) s and the shame continues.
Thursday, March 23, 2006
What Is Krementz Jewelry
中文 版
A recipe from the book "Dessert" ed. Marabout
for 20 pieces
60g raisins 80ml dark rum
200g dark chocolate 60g unsalted butter
125g caster sugar
250ml double cream 125g flour
3 eggs, beaten
cocoa P.
- Preheat oven to 180 ° C.
- Lightly grease a cake tin and line the bottom with parchment paper in the protruding sue two opposite sides.
- Combine raisins and rum. Chochlat Break into pieces and put it with the diced butter in a heatproof container.
- Melt in double boiler, stirring occasionally, then add the powdered sugar and cream.
- Sift flour into a bowl. Add the rum-raisin mixture and melted chocolate, then eggs. Mix.
- Pour this unit into the pan and smooth the surface. Bake 25 to 30 min.
- Cool completely, then refrigerate the cake overnight before cutting it into blocks. Sprinkle generously with cocoa.
Saturday, March 18, 2006
Breastfeeding To Teanagers
by Curtis E.
Hinkle Founder, OII
http://www.intersexualite.org/
ISNA (The Intersex Society of North America) promotes not only the pathologizing of intersex but also marginalizes those who want to celebrate diversity within our community.
Here
almost eight years I listen to and dialogue with intersex people worldwide. Almost tou (te) s feel excluded (e) s and again denied (s) by the normative discourse and binary ISNA.
The following quotes are typical found on their website. They are in bold:
"Intersex is mainly a problem of stigma and trauma, not gender."
We are very far from what hundreds of intersex people worldwide have told me when speaking of their lives, their identities and their problems. According to them / them, gender issues are more important than many other issues. Stereotypes and prejudices that he / she must face every day is a daily loss. Many of them have an identity intergender and others are transgender. Claim that gender issues are not a major problem for intersex people is a hocus-pocus that we once again reduced to objects of biological specimens.
In this way, the author (s) of articles on the website of ISNA, most of whom are women and not intersex, a normative discourse can continue based on our body and avoid listen to the people who inhabit these bodies.
"All children should be assigned boy or girl, but without surgery."
Why? Why should we still assign male or female to every child? Although the Act says every child must be legally boy or girl, I think the state should not rely on such a division of persons, whether "intersex" or not to lock them in a straitjacket of identity inadequate. If a child is unable to express its kind, why should we give to someone else the right to do so in its place?
What ISNA recommend for children with intersex.
(Article Title)
According to ISNA, we're not intersex but simply men and women "with intersex." For many of us it is very offensive. Intersex is a condition as could be diabetes. We are intersexed, that is our identity.
Other examples:
- Children with intersex
- Children and adults with intersex
- of Newborns with Intersex
- We have assembled a group of experts including healthcare professionals, adults with intersex and a parent to discuss these issues.
"Does ISNA think children with intersex should be raised without a genre, or in a third kind?"
(Headline)
The author, Alice Dreger says that there is nothing outside of both normative gender (boy or girl). Many of us do not agree. Instead of clearing and the identity of many intersex people, why not say clearly that this view is binary incompatible with the notion of representativeness which that person and rely ISNA? Most intersex people I know find it bizarre to say the least for a group claiming to represent us.
"Second, the most important thing for us is to try to create a world where children with intersex may live in safety. Give them a kind of non-existent label will not help. (Duh, huh)?"
What arrogance! Alice Dreger, who is not intersexed, and who speaks for us, but do not listen to us, telling us that our kind does not exist by "essence" and ended this statement invisibilization on intonation in English very offensive "Duh" - a word we use in English to emphasize the stupidity of such an idea. Well, me, I would ask him his definition of any sex or gender as "essence", including all members of that class. Gender or the feminine gender are they categories by "essence"? A woman without a uterus is it, for Mrs. Dreger, a woman ... or another "thing" without identity? Why not allow those concerned to determine their identity, what is "essential" for them?
It is free to be a woman but is obviously unable to understand our true nature. I do not want him but do the others, those who do not meet the "coefficient normative" or unwilling to submit to the dictates gender, should not have that same choice? Before speaking to intersex people, we must listen and understand that many of us will not say aloud what we think quietly. We have been indoctrinated (s) by a gender system still prevalent where people with a voice are irrelevant. God have mercy on us, we are in the hands of experts!
But is that all this does not simply lack of humanity? We have learned and continue to learn in the pain that we do not feel male or female often has serious consequences on our lives everyday. A heavy silence is imposed upon us throughout our lives because the power of phonies "who know what is good for us is overwhelming. How not to be tragic contemplation of an organization to help intersex people who adopt the same method dictatorial? The denial of our lives we are condemned to invisibility.
The Intersex Society of North America (ISNA) is the primary source for people seeking information and advice about atypical reproductive anatomy and disorders of sexual differentiation (DSD).
Well now, ISNA has decided to change the name of the disease, as if this clever modification would change anything in practice. And more ISNA claims not play a semantic game.
We read the following on their website in their definition for intersex:
"Rather than trying to play a semantic game that never ends ever, we at ISNA we take a pragmatic approach on the question of who counts as intersex person. "
The denial of the identity of intersex people is not a game This often has serious consequences ISNA will one day assume.
Sunday, March 12, 2006
Ice Cream Hair Coloring
A binary large meal, please
The McDonaldization of intersex activism by Curtis E. Hinkle
of the International Organization of intersex
After reading following section on the website of ISNA,
http://www.isna.org/faq/not_eradicating_gender
I knew he had to break the silence and speak frankly about the exclusion and marginalization of many intersex people I know by the groups we represent.
Imagine a world in which the main division between people is the weight. This is the first thing noticed at birth to be recorded on all birth certificates - lean or obese.
Imagine a world in which obese dominated scarce and where it would be almost impossible for a thin person to become an obese person and vice versa.
Imagine a world where people of medium build could not exist legally, except in one of two legal categories - fat or thin.
To read more:
http://www.cmaq.net/fr/node/23809
Saturday, March 11, 2006
Average Cost Of A Kiosk In A Mall
Have fun! These tests are used to explain why any definition of different sexes and genders is complicated and probably impossible.
Am I intersex?
Severe Problems With Swollen Feet After Pregnancy
by Curtis Hinkle
Organization Intersex International es
Here are the various forms of sexism that our members frequently experience intersex / intergender:
1) The idea received that there can be only two sexes / two genera.
2) The claim that intersex people undergo pathology is identical to the ruling that homosexuality was a disease a few decades ago.
3) The rejection of intersex people who identify outside of the binary.
4) Exclusion of women intersex groups of lesbians and other women's groups.
5) "Féminophobie (condescension towards behavior and gender generally considered typically female).
6) The Transphobia is particularly offensive when it comes from groups of people intersex.
To read the article.
Egyptian Cotton Vs Turkish Cotton
1. Intersex means that a person has two genitals
2. 1 in 2000 infants is born intersex
3. Intersex has to do with homosexuality
4. Intersex has nothing to do with gender (Posted on the homepage of ISNA)
5. Intersex is part of the transgender movement
6. Only true hermaphrodites are real hermaphrodites
7. The transsexualism is not an intersex condition.
8. The intersex movement is a movement like other identity movements GLBT
9. Most intersex were assigned female
10. Intersex is a condition treatable
To read the entire article, click here.
Birthday Invitation Joint Wording Templates
From the violent binary construct of gender * / **
Antke Engel
Translated from German by E. Curtis Hinkle
Historically, the intersexed, people whose sex can not be clearly defined as male or female, trying to educate the public about their experiences with cultural taboos, standardization and mandatory practice Medical violent. Until the 20th century, i they were classified as hermaphrodites es. The so-called medical progress has not only pathologized-es, but in addition it has medicalized their existence. Currently, they have invented a new term, that of "intersex" as a political category, often after having lived for years in one sex that had been assigned strength.
Monday, February 27, 2006
Wednesday, February 22, 2006
Blowing In Baby's Mouth
中文 版
Ingredients: 120g butter
softened ½ teaspoon salt ½ teaspoon baking
1 egg 300g flour sifted 100g frozen spinach
Preparation:
1. Beat butter until creamy, add egg, salt and baking soda, mix.
2. Stir in frozen spinach mixture on 1
3. Gradually add flour while mixing. Kneading until a smooth paste,
4. Wrap the dough and let it rest 1 hour in the fridge.
5. Preheat oven to 180 ° C
6. Roll dough on a lightly floured surface and prick it with a fork.
7. Laver; bake for 15 mins., Let cool and store in a tin.
Friday, February 17, 2006
Monday, February 13, 2006
Male Brazilian Wax Washington Dc
Chinese
Loukoums au Parfum de Rose
Cheesecake Rose de Saint Valentin
Bonbons croquants framboises-roses